Thursday, December 1, 2011

Sonnet VIII and Don Pedro


Lucia Palazzo
Dr. Lay
WSC 002
30 September 2011
Music, Marriage, and Mating: Don Pedro and Shakespeare’s Eight Sonnet
In Shakespearean England, marriage was on everyone’s minds. Human lifespans were drastically shorter, so settling down and producing offspring was a primary concern. For this reason it is not surprising that if you read enough of Shakespeare’s work, you’ll be bound to notice a common theme: wedded love and procreation. Essentially all of Shakespeare’s comedies end in one or more marriages, and many of the characters in his tragedies desire to be married, even if they never quite succeed. In his sonnets, too, you can see what appears to be a downright obsession with what he preaches as the natural cycle of life. The Bard wants you to have babies, and he uses the characters in his dramas and the speakers in his poems to let you know. Don Pedro is one of these characters, and Much Ado About Nothing is one of these plays. An examination of Don Pedro and Shakespeare’s Sonnet VIII reveals that both the prince and the speaker of the poem express similar sentiments.
To understand why Don Pedro is reminiscent of the speaker of the sonnet, one must first examine the poem itself. It reads:
Music to hear, why hear'st thou music sadly?
Sweets with sweets war not, joy delights in joy.
Why lovest thou that which thou receivest not gladly,
Or else receivest with pleasure thine annoy?
If the true concord of well-tuned sounds,
By unions married, do offend thine ear,
They do but sweetly chide thee, who confounds
In singleness the parts that thou shouldst bear.
Mark how one string, sweet husband to another,
Strikes each in each by mutual ordering,
Resembling sire and child and happy mother
Who all in one, one pleasing note do sing:
Whose speechless song, being many, seeming one,
Sings this to thee: 'thou single wilt prove none.
            The speaker first compares his listener to music, and asks him why, if he is sweet to hear, that hearing music makes him sad? He says that sweet, joyful things complement each other, and asks why it is then, that his listener loves things that are no good for him—things that only upset him? The speaker says that if well-tuned music, or in other words, the true unity of marriage, offend you, it is only because it reminds you of all the things you must bear alone. He then says that married people strike harmonious chords in one another, and that a father, child, and mother make a beautiful harmony because they all sing or play their part. He concludes by saying that this family joins together to sing a warning that being alone will get you nowhere.
It is easy to picture Don Pedro reciting these lines. He is the character heading the attempt to get the quarrelsome Beatrice and Benedick to recognize the true feelings that lie beneath their verbal sparring. Though they protest, he is determined to make them realize that marriage is inescapable, even if he has to resort to trickery. In the very beginning of the play, Benedick says, “…prove that I will get again with drinking, pick out mine eyes with a ballad-maker’s pen, and hang me up at the door of a brothel house for the sign of blind Cupid.” (I.i.230-235) Don Pedro responds, “Well, if ever thou dost fall from this faith, thou wilt prove a notable argument.” (I.i.236-237) This is a hint that he will indeed be attempting to make an example of Benedick. He insists that “In time the savage bull doth bear the yoke.” (I.i.241-242) When Benedick protests again, he replies, “Nay, if Cupid have not spent all his quiver in Venice, thou wilt quake for this shortly.” (I.i.251-252) He is essentially telling Benedick that he will have to answer to love itself for all his remonstrations.
Don Pedro and the speaker of Sonnet VIII share more than just a belief in the inevitability of coupling down. A common metaphor or theme is present in both cases: music. Just as the speaker of Sonnet VIII uses music as a metaphor for harmonious love, so Don Pedro seems preoccupied with musical imagery. When he, Leonato, Claudio, and Balthasar stage a conversation to trick Benedick into hearing of Beatrice’s “love” for him, they incorporate song into the performance. Don Pedro says to Balthasar, “I pray thee sing, and let me woo no more,” (II.iii.47) and “Nay pray thee, come, or if thou wilt hold longer argument, do it in notes.” (II.iii.54-55.) Just like the speaker of Sonnet VIII suggested that an argument for the harmony of a family could be made through music, so Don Pedro believes in the swaying power of song.
Aside from the obvious mentions of music while a song is taking place, the prince utilizes musical symbolism elsewhere. He says of Benedick, “He hath twice or thrice cut Cupid’s bow string, and the little hangman dare not shoot at him. He hath a heart as sound as a bell, and his tongue is the clapper; for what his heart thinks his tongue speaks.” (III.ii.9-13) Here is an example of a clanging rather than harmonious instrument, Benedick, that works against love.
            Shakespeare uses both Don Pedro and Sonnet VIII to voice his opinions. The Much Ado About Nothing prince and the anonymous narrator share a taste for the musical, but more importantly, the obsession with love and marriage present in so many of Shakespeare’s works.

Monday, October 3, 2011

Shakespeare's Sonnet 130 and Billy Collins' Litany

1. Collin uses humor to mock this trope.

2.Shakespeare knocks it down in a more aggressive, sincere way.

3. Collins says nothing truly insulting because his metaphors are too absurd to be taken seriously.

4. Shakespeare truly seems to insult his mistress.

5.For Collins, the main point of the work is mockery of a poetic device.

6. Shakespeare also does this, but the last two lines, which focus on a genuine love, suggest he may also be writing this sonnet out of true emotion.
 

Litany-Billy Collins

1. Simply a parody, or mockery?

2. He gives a very straight faced presentation.

3. The poem becomes more and more absurd.

4. His intro provides an explanation, and is also humorous. 

5. The poem would still be effective without the intro, but it adds to it. It provides an explanation of the form he is parodying and his "thievery."

6. He goes directly from the intro to the poem; I almost missed the transition.

7.Refers to the page often.

8. His almost monotone delivery adds to the comedy. He is supposed to be saying something romantic and he sounds completely blase. Perhaps this is because he is trying to make a point about the staleness of the form.

Shihan: Flashy Words

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X9A_k6Sj-Pg

Observations and thoughts:

1. Extensive vocabulary.

2. Uses ambiguous pronouns to tell stories. "He said......she lost hope."

3. "And I swear to God if I could swear to God I'd ask her" is an interesting take on how often we throw around the phrase "Swear to God".

4. He also refers to God as a woman, probably because we often use male pronouns to refer to God by default. He's playing with assumptions in language.

5. "Pupils become pupils." stood out to me as a nice piece of wordlplay.

6. He invokes a classic nursery rhyme about words when he starts to quote "Sticks and Stones."

7. It is almost impossible to keep up with his incredibly fast delivery.

8. He gets the audience pumped up at the beginning like a concert.

9. He uses a lot of repetition.

10. He makes use of wild hand gestures. A very enthusiastic performance. You can hear the passion in his voice.


11. A random subjective experience that colored my vision of this poem: A few months back I was critiquing all different sorts of poetry with my friends. As a joke, I created this fake poetry jam persona, because I've seen a lot of terrible poetry jams. The intentionally atrocious poem I came up with on the spot as a parody revolved around peace. It contained a line that went something along the lines of "If you piece the pieces of peace together" and another that said, "Peace is a piece of the pie..the American dream...what we're all fighting for..a contradiction." (Insert bongos here.)

Unfortunately, as much as I like Shihan's poem, I can now never take his line "Piece together piece of pieces, peace within me." seriously, because it will always make me think of the most trite thing I could come up with at some party.

Tell the truth but tell it slant: How is Dickinson's poem fresh?

1. Definite meter.

2. Abab rhyme scheme is easy to follow and has an almost musical quality.

3. Emphasis on certain words. (Capitalized.)

4. She does not use traditional punctuation, so a reader must determine how to read it if they haven't read it before.

5. Alliterative use of the "s" sound causes a sort of hissing quality. This sound is associated with snakes, and as a result, deception.

6. The word slant has a naturally unappealing sound to the English speaking ear. Most "sl" words are unsavory: Slug, slip, slime, sludge.

Taylor Mali's Poem in Print (Materialism)

Here are some things I noticed about the text version of Taylor Mali's poem.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OEBZkWkkdZA

1. Italicizes words he is trying to present as weak.


2. Uses BOLD font for important points.


3. Builds pictures. (For example, the words forming a falling tree.) 


4. Black words on an off-white background is reminiscent of old paper. Also makes for a pleasing color scheme.

5. Spells some things phonetically. "Ya know?"

5. Varies fonts to impress his point upon viewers and draw the eye. All the little typographical choices help to maintain interest.

6. The words move quickly, so you really have to pay attention.

Tuesday, September 27, 2011

Taylor Mali's Poem Live (Materialism)

Here are some observations I made while watching Mali perform:

1. Uses humor to make his point.
2. Knowledge of grammar.
3. Dramatic words and phrasing
4. Use of slang.
5. Numbers 2 and 3 juxtapose nicely against number 4. He blends low and high elements.
6. Uses lots of gestures.
7. Emphasizes and pauses effectively.
8. Wears a Scrabble shirt. (Relates to his topic: words.)
9.His clean cut image matches his message to return to traditional forms of language and communication. He looks a bit like an English teacher. (A cool English teacher.)
10. He doesn't pace around the stage. Instead, he "stands his ground," as he urges his listeners to do when they "speak with conviction."
11. Speaks at an even tempo. Easy to follow.